🔗 Share this article

Established political parties are more and more allowing the radical right to dictate the political agenda, as per a recent research carried out in Germany.

Researchers discovered that this phenomenon has unwittingly benefited far-right groups by validating their ideas and spreading them to a broader audience.

Analysis Based on Over 20 Years of Media Reporting

The results, published in the European Journal of Political Research, utilized an computerized content review of more than 520,000 articles from six national newspapers.

Berlin-based researchers observed that as the radical faction moved from marginal topics in the 1990s era to core subjects like integration and immigration, mainstream political groups progressively adjusted their messaging in reaction.

This adjustment boosted the spread of these ideas and indicated to voters that such positions were legitimate.

Consequences for Democratic Systems

"Political communication by mainstream parties is crucial in the voting performance of the far right," explained a political sociologist participating in the research.

"This element has been underestimated," she noted.

The effect was evident even when conventional groups were criticising the radical faction. "They still receive focus," the expert remarked. "Our core argument is that because we live in such a struggle for visibility, this focus is crucial."

Normalisation Phenomenon Throughout Europe

While the study was focused on Germany, this normalisation effect is probable to affect nations across the European continent.

"This is frequently observed in European media," explained another co-author. "The far right makes a statement and everybody starts talking about it for one week."

"Even if you're opposing it, you're repeating it," he stated.

Hardening of Public Rhetoric

At certain points, leaders have also toughened their language to match that of the far right.

In a recently published interview, a former German chancellor advocated large-scale deportations and urged them to happen "more frequently and rapidly."

Similar instances can be found across the continent, as politicians from nations including the UK to the French Republic embrace the rhetoric of the far right, particularly on immigration.

This has formed an echo chamber that was unthinkable a ten years prior.

Core Problem: Who Dictates the Narrative?

"{If you're a moderate political group and you are talking about societal topics – migration, assimilation – in a way that is determined by the rhythm of the far right, that's the whole idea of narrative control," clarified a study author.

Other parties have gone one step further, seeking to copy the hardline agenda of the radical right, even as studies indicates that doing so drives voters to cast their ballot for the far right.

Progressive Impact and Public Perception

The scope of information gathered showed that the impact of radical groups had been gradual and had grown with the passage of time.

"Public perception doesn't change from one day to another," stated a researcher. "However, when you encounter this negative framing around immigration frequently, and it is being spread not only by radical groups but also, for instance, by mainstream political organizations, then of course this narrative travels further."

Need for Mainstream Parties to Carve Out Their Distinct Discourses

The study highlighted the necessity for established political parties to carve out their distinct narratives, particularly on subjects such as migration and assimilation, rather than constantly trailing after the radical right.

"It's like a dance," explained one author. "If the conductor is far-right and you're responding to them, you cannot decide which music should be heard."